Document a blocked crypto withdrawal before a platform changes the story

Preserve the request, response and payment trail so that a later explanation can be checked against the original event.

Investment schemes · Source record: · Checked:
By Crypto Newsroom (AI-assisted) · AI-assisted research · Independent human review pending
· EN · Revision 2
Cited claims
2
Source records
2
Edition revision
2
In this investigation

Create a withdrawal timeline

Practical checklist · not an audit of another provider

Record when you requested the withdrawal, the asset and amount, the destination and the status shown. Save confirmation messages and error notices with dates. Keep the difference between an internal pending entry and a completed blockchain or bank transfer clear. If the platform changes its explanation, retain both versions rather than replacing the first with the latest message.

[1]Supporting evidence ↓

Record new conditions separately

Practical checklist · not an audit of another provider

List every additional fee, tax, upgrade or token purchase demanded after the request. Identify who made the demand and where the money was supposed to go. The Forcount case illustrates why a new token should not be treated as proof that an older obligation has been satisfied. Do not send further funds merely to complete your documentation.

[1]Supporting evidence ↓

Prepare an official report

Practical checklist · not an audit of another provider

The FBI's guidance prioritises transaction details, receiving addresses, dates, amounts and the communications that led to the transfer. Keep a private evidence copy and redact personal information before sharing anything publicly. For a European complaint, identify the relevant local authority as well. A complete timeline can help explain the incident; it does not guarantee that funds will be recovered.

[1][2]Supporting evidence ↓

Preserve the before-and-after offer

Practical checklist · not an audit of another provider

Keep a dated copy of the original balance, withdrawal request and contractual terms. Then record the proposed replacement asset, conversion ratio, acceptance deadline, responsible entity and any waiver of the original claim. Put 'unknown' beside missing redemption terms. Save changes to the explanation as separate entries rather than editing earlier notes. A useful evidence bundle lets a reviewer reconstruct what you were owed, what you requested and what the platform proposed instead, without requiring you to make another deposit or accept the conversion to gather proof.

[1]Supporting evidence ↓

Sources, dates and limits

This is an archive of the October 2024 sentencing announcement. References to withdrawal problems, Mindexcoin and the end of payments describe the historical scheme. No present token price, active claims window or recovery rate is asserted.

[1]Supporting evidence ↓

Evidence & sources

Statements and quotations retain the editorial or source language. Open a supporting excerpt to inspect the original record.

  1. [1]Adjudicated finding

    DOJ's October 2024 sentencing record describes Juan Tacuri's 240-month sentence and Forcount's false mining, trading and token claims.

    Supporting excerpt: Senior Promoter In Cryptocurrency Ponzi Scheme Sentenced To 240 Months In Prison
    240 months
    Senior Promoter In Cryptocurrency Ponzi Scheme Sentenced To 240 Months In Prison ↗

    Source language: EN · Captured Oct 22, 2026

  2. [2]Source reported

    FBI guidance recommends stopping further payments and preserving transaction details when cryptocurrency investment fraud is suspected.

    Supporting excerpt: Cryptocurrency Investment Fraud
    the most important information you can provide are transaction details
    Cryptocurrency Investment Fraud ↗

    Source language: EN · Captured Oct 22, 2026