Record a crypto loss without mixing token amounts and dollar values
Preserve original transaction facts and label every conversion with its date and method.
- Cited claims
- 2
- Source records
- 2
- Edition revision
- 2
In this investigation
Keep the native asset quantity
Practical checklist · not an audit of another provider
For each transfer, record the network, asset, amount, transaction identifier and time. Keep exchange statements or receipts that show what you paid. A token ticker by itself may be ambiguous, so retain the identifying details supplied by the original transaction record. Do not overwrite these facts with a later estimate in another currency.
Label conversions explicitly
Practical checklist · not an audit of another provider
If you need a fiat equivalent, state the date and source used for the conversion. Distinguish the amount paid, the value at the incident and a current estimate. The USI Tech announcement demonstrates why the valuation date is material. This record-keeping approach is not a determination of the legally recoverable loss, which may follow different rules.
Separate payments from displayed balances
Practical checklist · not an audit of another provider
Maintain deposits, withdrawals and internal platform balances in separate columns. An apparent profit may never have existed outside the platform. The FBI recommends including transaction details even when you are unsure of their relevance. Submit what you actually know through verified reporting channels, explain gaps honestly and avoid fabricating a precise total to make an incomplete history look complete.
Keep a transaction and valuation pair
Practical checklist · not an audit of another provider
For each transfer, save the original asset quantity, network, transaction identifier and timestamp. If your exchange statement includes a fiat amount, preserve that document and label what the number represents. Put any later conversion in a different column with its date and rate source. Do not overwrite the original quantity with a rounded dollar total. If two records disagree, retain both and note the discrepancy. This makes the file usable for later reconciliation without pretending that your personal conversion determines a court's loss calculation.
Sources, dates and limits
Checked 23 October 2026 against the January 2024 charging release and the FBI wanted notice. The $150 million valuation in the original announcement was a date-specific value of transfers, not a current portfolio value. Underlying fraud allegations remain attributed to their sources.
Evidence & sources
- Filed allegation
The January 2024 DOJ announcement charged Horst Jicha over USI Tech and described allegedly missing crypto valued at approximately $150 million at the date of his arrest.
Supporting excerpt: CEO of Crypto Investment Platform Charged in Multi-Million Dollar International Fraud Scheme
valued at approximately $150 million as of the date of his arrest
CEO of Crypto Investment Platform Charged in Multi-Million Dollar International Fraud Scheme ↗ - Source reported
The FBI's notice states that Horst Jicha's monitoring device stopped working on 3 October 2024 and agents were unable to locate him. It records a warrant issued the following day for an alleged pretrial-release violation. The notice was still available when checked on 23 October 2026. It is evidence of the FBI's stated wanted status, not a criminal judgment on the underlying USI Tech allegations or independent confirmation of his current location.