Analysis · Investment schemes
EminiFX: a regular weekly number can be a designed display
Consistency in a dashboard is not evidence that the underlying trading result exists.
Analysis of crypto fraud cases, custody risks and market claims, grounded in the available evidence.
Articles: 30 · Page 1 of 3
Analysis · Investment schemes
Consistency in a dashboard is not evidence that the underlying trading result exists.
Analysis · Investment schemes
The useful question was where payouts came from, rather than how sophisticated the software sounded.
Analysis · Investment schemes
An impressive throughput claim does not establish profitable execution or the source of customer withdrawals.
Analysis · Mining claims
The case separates contract sales, displayed output and the physical ability to produce that output.
Analysis · Market manipulation
The record explains how a popularity signal can be produced by coordinated activity rather than distinct investors.
Analysis · Mining claims
A sales network can grow without establishing the revenue or regulatory status of the investment it promotes.
Analysis · Investment schemes
The alleged membership pitch illustrates the gap between a payout schedule and evidence of underlying revenue.
Analysis · Custody & lending
Yield, liquidity and deposit protection are separate claims, even when one product markets them together.
Analysis · Recovery & reporting
An official process has a defined authority and terms; scammers can imitate its appearance without acquiring that authority.
Analysis · Custody & lending
How an affiliated trading firm's permissions undermined the exchange's promises about customer deposits.
Analysis · Investment schemes
A contract can execute its rules while the rules still depend on a continuing supply of new participants.
Analysis · Recovery & reporting
A large forfeiture figure is meaningful, but it is not an individual payout statement.