EN 
Analysis · Custody & lending
Unocoin: why an account freeze leaves another signing route
Unocoin’s incident shows how platform controls and wallet signatures differ. We examine the recovery route, key separation and what an enterprise freeze stops.
Unocoin
Project dossier · EN coverage
The evidence in one view: source records, cited claims and the editions that put them into context.
Custody & lending ·Source record: Nov 13, 2026 · Checked: Nov 14, 2026
Archive · Statements of 12 and 13 November 2026 and current BitGo documentation reviewed on 14 November. Incident findings are attributed to the companies; investigation continues.
- Cited claims
- 5
- Source records
- 5
- Related editions
- 1
What the record says
Unocoin’s incident shows how platform controls and wallet signatures differ. We examine the recovery route, key separation and what an enterprise freeze stops.
What the evidence supports
Only claims cited in the visible editions appear here. Each retains its own evidence status.
- Source reported
Unocoin updated its incident explanation.
Supporting excerpt: Unocoin security incident update
Update on 13 November 2026
Unocoin security incident update ↗ - Source reported
BitGo describes the ordinary signing arrangement.
- Source reported
Recovery transactions bypass BitGo policies.
Supporting excerpt: BitGo Wallet Recovery Wizard
Recovery transactions bypass any policies
BitGo Wallet Recovery Wizard ↗ - Source reported
BitGo distinguishes a platform freeze from blockchain control.
Supporting excerpt: BitGo statement on the Unocoin incident
does not lock funds at the blockchain level
BitGo statement on the Unocoin incident ↗ - Source reported
Wallet types assign key control differently.